Hospitals

Aside

Hospitals

As soon as the door to the waiting room of the hospital emergency center opened, the sounds and sights of bedlam rushed to meet us. The waiting room was overcrowded with a confused and boisterous mixture of the ill, friends of the ill, screaming babies, noisy adolescents, and those who seemingly had no idea why they were there.  On one side of the room, the individuals waiting to be processed by the receptionist were fidgeting, with frustrated looks as they impatiently waited for their turn. All showed their disgust with looks of, “Why is this taking so long?” Others, having been processed by the receptionist, were sitting or standing, just waiting to be called into emergency room for treatment, hoping that their long waits would finally end. Intermittently their hopes of care would be raised as a nurse appeared at the door to shout the name of the next patient to receive treatment. Frequently their hopes were dashed as the name called out by the nurse was not the one they wanted to hear; their frustration continued with a hint of anger beginning to surface. The delay in being seen and treated by a doctor seemed endless.

Finally, the person’s name was called and he, along with a relative, moved towards the door where the nurse was standing. Now he could discuss his illness with a doctor and, hopefully, a remedy would be offered. There would be no certainty of a cure, but at least a course of action would be recommended; a stay in the hospital or a prescription for medication may result.  Hope, but no certainty would be the likely outcome of the visit.

Most hospitals have trained, professional personnel who analyze and evaluate the medical, physical needs of their patients. The question that they attempt to answer is “How do we help the patients at the hospital return to good physical health?”.  However, there exists another type of hospital with trained professionals; one that addresses the moral and spiritual failings of individuals who are seeking to return to good moral and spiritual health. It is the one that treats sin and sinners.

Sin occurs in the breaking of one’s relationship with God; fortunately the relationship can be restored. The Catholic Church is the hospital for sinners; the place where sin can be cured and moral and spiritual health restored. When asked the reasons for his conversion to Catholicism, the brilliant 20th century English writer and philosopher, G.K. Chesterton, commented, “Because it is true….and it offers the forgiveness of sin.” The Catholic Church was given the obligation to help sinners and forgive sins when Jesus Christ appeared to Apostles on the first Easter Sunday and said, “Whose sins you shall forgive are forgiven and whose sins you shall retain are retained.”  In the sacrament of Confession (Reconciliation), the Church through the successors to the apostles can offer a guaranteed return to a relationship with God. The sacrament of Confession offers an assurance, not just a hope, of one’s return to good moral and spiritual health.

It is interesting to note that medical hospitals are generally crowded and very busy, while Catholic churches are often empty at the times of Confession. Are there no sinners in need of forgiveness? Have humans lost the very sense of sin? We all sin and most of us rupture our relationship with God numerous times during our lives. Do we return to God through Confession or do we continue to be separate from God.  All humans need repentance for their sins and a renewal of their lives.

On many occasions, Jesus reminded people “to repent.” We are all anxious to cure our medical ills as quickly as possible. Why are we not as determined and anxious to repent and cure our moral and spiritual failings, which can result in the worst of conditions….hell? Without repentance and renewal, Hell is where we will place ourselves.

Suggested Reading

“Confession” by Adrienne von Speyr, published by Igantius Press  – von Speyr is a Swiss convert and mystic guided by the famed theologian Fr. Hans Urs von Balthasar

The Real Presence

The Real Presence

It started as a little spark, so small, so insignificant, but continued to grow and spread. The little spark became a fire, which very rapidly turned into a wild, then cyclonic conflagration as it sucked more and more air into itself… Nature continued to change the air into food for the ragging inferno. Nature had changed one substance into another, a common occurrence in nature. Yet God the creator of nature is questioned when He changes bread and wine into His own Body and Blood.

What images can one use to describe the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist? How can such a mystery be explained? It is difficult to create any adequate images that may help a person understand that Jesus Christ is really present, body and blood, in the Eucharist after the priest consecrates the bread and wine at Mass. The best approach may just be to use the words of Jesus Himself when He issues His demand….yes it is a demand, to eat His body and drink His blood. Jesus is the guarantor of the reality of the actual presence of His body and blood in the Catholic Eucharist.

In his gospel, John thoroughly relates the command of Jesus to “eat my flesh and drink my blood.” Jesus began his discourse on what we now call the Eucharist shortly after He fed the multitudes with bread and fish. Thus Jesus had prepared his followers for His astonishing revelation that they must be prepared to eat His flesh and drink His blood. Indeed though it was a difficult command to understand and accept, yet it occurred only after Jesus had presided over many miracles; He was preparing His followers for some hard teachings. Many could not accept the direction to eat His flesh and drink His blood; it was too hard for them. When followers began to murmur against the idea of eating His flesh and drinking His blood, Jesus did not change or refine His message. Jesus did not indicate that he was speaking only symbolically, but rather He emphasized that He was truly commanding his disciples to eat of His flesh and drink His blood. Then as now, Jesus was willing to accept the loss of many of His followers, rather than water down the truth of the requirement to eat His body and drink His blood.

St. Thomas Aquinas clearly stated in his Summa Gentiles that “by the conversion of bread into the body of Christ the very body of Christ exists in this Sacrament of the Church and is eaten by the faithful.” In the Catholic Catechism it is proclaimed, “By the consecration the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ is brought about. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a true, real, and substantial manner: his Body and his Blood, with his soul and his divinity.”

Pope John Paul II wrote in Ecclesia in America: “My Predecessor Paul VI deemed it necessary to explain the uniqueness of Christ’s real presence in the Eucharist, which ‘is called real not to exclude the idea that the others are real too, but rather to indicate presence par excellence, because it is sub­stantial.’ … Under the species of bread and wine, ‘Christ is present, whole and entire in his physical reality, corporally present.”

Father John Hardon, the highly regarded 20th century theologian and philosopher, described the Catholic belief in actual presence of the body and blood of Jesus in the Eucharist in the following manner.

“During the supper with His apostles on Holy Thursday, after blessing the bread and wine, Jesus once again commanded the apostles to eat His flesh and drink His blood in remembrance of Him. The celebration of the Eucharist has been part of the Catholic worship since the beginnings of the church. The Church has been consistent through the centuries that after the consecration of the bread and wine by a priest, the Eucharist contains the actual body and blood of Jesus. We are to believe that the Eucharist is Jesus Christ – simply, without qualification. It is God become man in the fullness of His divine nature, in the fullness of His human nature, in the fullness of His body and soul, in the fullness of everything that makes Jesus Jesus. He is in the Eucharist with His human mind and will united with the Divinity, with His hands and feet, His face and features, with His eyes and lips and ears and nostrils, with His affections and emotions and, with emphasis, with His living, pulsating, physical Sacred Heart. That is what our Catholic Faith demands of us that we believe. If we believe this, we are Catholic. If we do not, we are not, no matter what people may think we are.”

Assuming a person is Catholic and that Jesus is God, then it seems reasonable….no, more than reasonable….that a person should thirst after the Eucharist. What a great gift? Should not mankind flock to it?

Additional Reading Suggestions

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0941.htm   Fr. John Hardon article

http://www.catholic.com/tracts/who-can-receive-commmunion  

www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a3.htm  The Catholic Catechism